From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Barnett

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals
Dec 2, 2011
Unpublished Opinion No. 2011-UP-532 (S.C. Ct. App. Dec. 2, 2011)

Opinion

Unpublished Opinion No. 2011-UP-532

12-02-2011

The State, Respondent, v. James Joseph Barnett, Appellant.

Appellate Defender Elizabeth A. Franklin-Best, of Columbia, for Appellant. Attorney General Alan Wilson, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, and Assistant Attorney General Mark R. Farthing, all of Columbia; and Solicitor Barry J. Barnette, of Spartanburg, for Respondent.


THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

Appeal From Spartanburg County

J. Derham Cole, Circuit Court Judge


AFFIRMED

Appellate Defender Elizabeth A. Franklin-Best, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan Wilson, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, and Assistant Attorney General Mark R. Farthing, all of Columbia; and Solicitor Barry J. Barnette, of Spartanburg, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM : James Joseph Barnett appeals his convictions for assault and battery with intent to kill, armed robbery, and kidnapping, arguing the trial court abused its discretion by allowing him to absent himself from the proceedings. We affirm pursuant to Rule 220(b)(1), SCACR, and the following authority: State v. Ravenell, 387 S.C. 449, 456, 692 S.E.2d 554, 558 (Ct. App. 2010) ("In order to claim the protection afforded by the rule of law that a criminal defendant may be tried in his absence only upon a trial court's finding that the defendant has received the requisite notice of his right to be present and advisement that the trial would proceed in his absence if he failed to attend, a defendant or his attorney must object at the first opportunity to do so, and failure to so object constitutes waiver of the issue on appeal." (citation omitted)).

We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

AFFIRMED.

SHORT, WILLIAMS, and GEATHERS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

State v. Barnett

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals
Dec 2, 2011
Unpublished Opinion No. 2011-UP-532 (S.C. Ct. App. Dec. 2, 2011)
Case details for

State v. Barnett

Case Details

Full title:The State, Respondent, v. James Joseph Barnett, Appellant.

Court:THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals

Date published: Dec 2, 2011

Citations

Unpublished Opinion No. 2011-UP-532 (S.C. Ct. App. Dec. 2, 2011)