From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. B. H. (In re B. H.)

COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF OREGON
Jul 2, 2014
329 P.3d 813 (Or. Ct. App. 2014)

Summary

accepting concession

Summary of this case from State v. Z.A.B. (In re Z.A.B.)

Opinion

A155874 C130067MC.

2014-07-2

In the Matter of B.H., Alleged to be a Mentally Ill Person. State of Oregon, Respondent, v. B.H., Appellant.

Washington County Circuit Court. Andrew Erwin, Judge. Garrett A. Richardson and Multnomah Defenders, Inc., filed the brief for appellant. Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, Anna M. Joyce, Solicitor General, and Inge D. Wells, Senior Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.


Washington County Circuit Court.
Andrew Erwin, Judge.
Garrett A. Richardson and Multnomah Defenders, Inc., filed the brief for appellant. Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, Anna M. Joyce, Solicitor General, and Inge D. Wells, Senior Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.
Before ORTEGA, Presiding Judge, and DeVORE, Judge, and GARRETT, Judge.

PER CURIAM.

In this appeal, appellant seeks reversal of an order committing him for a period not to exceed 180 days. ORS 426.130. He contends, in an unpreserved assignment of error, that the trial court erred in failing to inform him of his right to subpoena witnesses, as required by ORS 426.100(1). The state concedes the error, and we agree that that failure constitutes plain error. We further conclude, for the reasons stated in State v. M.L.R., 256 Or.App. 566, 570–72, 303 P.3d 954 (2013), that it is appropriate to exercise our discretion to correct the error.

Our resolution obviates the need to address appellant's other assignment of error.

Reversed.




Summaries of

State v. B. H. (In re B. H.)

COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF OREGON
Jul 2, 2014
329 P.3d 813 (Or. Ct. App. 2014)

accepting concession

Summary of this case from State v. Z.A.B. (In re Z.A.B.)

conceding that advice that person could “call” witnesses did not inform person of right to subpoena witnesses

Summary of this case from State v. Z.A.B. (In re Z.A.B.)
Case details for

State v. B. H. (In re B. H.)

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of B. H., Alleged to be a Mentally Ill Person. STATE OF…

Court:COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF OREGON

Date published: Jul 2, 2014

Citations

329 P.3d 813 (Or. Ct. App. 2014)
264 Or. App. 186

Citing Cases

State v. Z.A.B. (In re Z.A.B.)

That is, advice that a person can “call” witnesses does not convey the right to have the court order the…