State v. Ashford

Full title: The State, Respondent, v. Randolph F. Ashford, Appellant.

Court: THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals

Date published: Jan 25, 2012

Unpublished Opinion No. 2012-UP-035 (S.C. Ct. App. Jan. 25, 2012)

Opinion

Unpublished Opinion No. 2012-UP-035

01-25-2012

The State, Respondent, v. Randolph F. Ashford, Appellant.

Deputy Chief Appellate Defender Wanda H. Carter, of Columbia; and Randolph F. Ashford, pro se, for Appellant. Attorney General Alan Wilson, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, and Solicitor Daniel E. Johnson, of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

Appeal From Richland County

G. Thomas Cooper, Circuit Court Judge

APPEAL DISMISSED

Deputy Chief Appellate Defender Wanda H. Carter, of Columbia; and Randolph F. Ashford, pro se, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan Wilson, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, and Solicitor Daniel E. Johnson, of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM : Randolph F. Ashford appeals his convictions for three counts of carjacking, two counts of assault with intent to kill, two counts of kidnapping, a count of first-degree criminal sexual conduct, and a count of first-degree burglary. After a thorough review of the record and all briefs pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss the appeal and grant counsel's motion to be relieved.¹

1 We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

FEW, C.J., THOMAS and KONDUROS, JJ., concur.