In Ancheta, the defendant was charged for Carrying, Using or Threatening to Use a Firearm in the Commission of a Separate Felony, in violation of HRS § 134-6(a) and (e) (Supp.
Summary of this case from State v. TuimalealiifanoNo. 29039.
November 9, 2009.
Memorandum Opinions Affirmed, vacated remanded.
In Ancheta, the defendant was charged for Carrying, Using or Threatening to Use a Firearm in the Commission of a Separate Felony, in violation of HRS § 134-6(a) and (e) (Supp.
Summary of this case from State v. TuimalealiifanoFull title:State v. Ancheta
Court:Intermediate Court of Appeals of Hawaii
Date published: Nov 9, 2009
The other challenged provision, HRS § 134-6, was repealed in 2006 and replaced by HRS §§ 134-21 through…
State v. TuimalealiifanoNotably, it appears that a mandatory minimum term under HRS § 706-660.1 (2014) could not be imposed as to…