From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Allen

Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Jun 8, 2022
No. 2022-UP-238 (S.C. Ct. App. Jun. 8, 2022)

Opinion

2022-UP-238 Appellate Case 2019-001766

06-08-2022

The State, Respondent, v. Anthony Bernard Allen, Appellant.

Appellate Defender Adam Sinclair Ruffin, of Columbia, for Appellant. Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General William M. Blitch, Jr., both of Columbia, for Respondent.


THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

Submitted May 1, 2022

Appeal From Greenville County Letitia H. Verdin, Circuit Court Judge

Appellate Defender Adam Sinclair Ruffin, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General William M. Blitch, Jr., both of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM

Dismissed after review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

We decide this case without argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

THOMAS, MCDONALD, and HEWITT, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

State v. Allen

Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Jun 8, 2022
No. 2022-UP-238 (S.C. Ct. App. Jun. 8, 2022)
Case details for

State v. Allen

Case Details

Full title:The State, Respondent, v. Anthony Bernard Allen, Appellant.

Court:Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Date published: Jun 8, 2022

Citations

No. 2022-UP-238 (S.C. Ct. App. Jun. 8, 2022)