From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Alexander

Supreme Court of Louisiana
Jul 1, 1993
620 So. 2d 1166 (La. 1993)

Summary

holding verbal abuse by the employer provided good cause for the employee to resign voluntarily

Summary of this case from Yaeger v. Florida Unemploy. Appeals

Opinion

No. 93-K-0309.

July 1, 1993.

APPEAL FROM CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT, ORLEANS PARISH, STATE OF LOUISIANA, HONORABLE CALVIN JOHNSON, J.

Bruce G. Whittaker, New Orleans, for applicant.

Richard P. Ieyoub, Atty. Gen., Harry F. Connick, Dist. Atty., Robyn C. Gulledge, for respondent.


A jury convicted defendant on two counts of distribution of cocaine in violation of LSA-R.S. 40:967 B(1). The trial court sentenced him as a multiple offender under LSA-R.S. 15:529.1 to concurrent terms of fifteen (15) years at hard labor. The convictions and sentences were affirmed. State v. Alexander, 612 So.2d 262 (La.App. 4th Cir. 1992). Defendant's writ application was granted to consider whether the trial court erred in denying a challenge for cause of prospective juror Julie Cullen, an employee of the Attorney General's office.

Cullen worked in the Orleans Parish District Attorney's office from June of 1975 to March of 1981, actively prosecuting cases for approximately four years. She had also practiced as a criminal defense attorney. In April of 1989, Cullen began working for the Attorney General's office. She directed a statewide anti-drug program funded by a federal grant, personally prosecuting drug cases around the state and supervising other attorneys conducting similar prosecutions.

When called for jury duty, Cullen was prosecuting a convicted felon charged with possession of a firearm in the same section of Orleans Criminal District Court as defendant's trial. The District Attorney's office had been recused from the case, and it had been taken over by the Attorney General's office. Cullen's participation was a special situation, necessitated by a change in the Attorney General's office personnel. Cullen was awaiting the outcome of a writ application when she was called for voir dire in this case.

At the close of Cullen's voir dire examination, the trial court denied defendant's challenge for cause, stating that Cullen's employment was not necessarily a reason to excuse her from jury service. Afterward, defense counsel exhausted his twelve peremptory challenges before completion of the jury panel. State v. Lee, 559 So.2d 1310 (La. 1990); State v. Hallal, 557 So.2d 1388 (La. 1990); State v. Brown, 496 So.2d 261 (La. 1986).

Prospective jurors' associations with law enforcement agencies or personnel require careful scrutiny by the trial judge. State v. Ford, 489 So.2d 1250, 1259 (La. 1986), vacated on other grounds, 479 U.S. 1077, 107 S.Ct. 1272, 94 L.Ed.2d 133 (1987), on remand, 503 So.2d 1009 (La. 1987). If bias or prejudice may be reasonably attributed to the relationship, a juror should be excused for cause. State v. Lewis, 391 So.2d 1156 (La. 1980).

Cullen's employment with the Attorney General's office and her active duties as a substitute prosecutor for the District Attorney were relationships which could have influenced her juror duties. LSA-C.Cr.P. art. 797(2) and (3). Bias in favor of the prosecution must be inferred. State v. Monroe, 366 So.2d 1345 (La. 1978); State v. Lewis, 391 So.2d 1156 (La. 1980).

Under these circumstances, the trial court clearly erred in denying the challenge for cause. Cullen appeared in court as the representative of the Attorney General, the chief legal officer of the state. La.Const., Art. IV, § 8. For two years, Cullen had prosecuted drug cases and supervised other attorney's doing the same type of work. She was actively discharging her prosecutorial role in the same courtroom when called for voir dire examination.

The trial court's ruling pitted Cullen's task as a juror in a cocaine prosecution against her job of enforcing the state's drug laws. The risk that Cullen could not resolve her conflicting roles successfully and "hold the balance nice, clear and true between the state and the accused" was unacceptable. State v. Lewis, supra, 391 So.2d at 1158.

For the foregoing reasons, the defendant's convictions are reversed, his sentences are vacated, and the case is remanded to the trial court for a new trial.

REVERSED; CONVICTIONS REVERSED; SENTENCES VACATED; REMANDED.

HALL, J., not on panel.


Summaries of

State v. Alexander

Supreme Court of Louisiana
Jul 1, 1993
620 So. 2d 1166 (La. 1993)

holding verbal abuse by the employer provided good cause for the employee to resign voluntarily

Summary of this case from Yaeger v. Florida Unemploy. Appeals
Case details for

State v. Alexander

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF LOUISIANA v. OLIVER B. ALEXANDER

Court:Supreme Court of Louisiana

Date published: Jul 1, 1993

Citations

620 So. 2d 1166 (La. 1993)

Citing Cases

Yaeger v. Florida Unemploy. Appeals

An employer's failure to provide its employees with a tolerable work environment has been found to be good…

State v. Wilson

Although personal connections to and relationships with law enforcement personnel do not, by themselves,…