From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Adams

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals
Jan 4, 2012
Unpublished Opinion No.  2012-UP-006 (S.C. Ct. App. Jan. 4, 2012)

Opinion

2012-UP-006

01-04-2012

The State, Respondent, v. Willie James Adams, Jr., Appellant.

Appellate Defender Kathrine Hudgins, of Columbia, for Appellant. Attorney General Alan Wilson, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Donald J. Zelenka, and Assistant Attorney General Brendan J. McDonald, all of Columbia; and Solicitor Douglas A. Barfield, Jr., of Lancaster, for Respondent.


UNPUBLISHED OPINION

Submitted December 1, 2011

Appeal From Fairfield County Howard P. King, Circuit Court Judge.

Appellate Defender Kathrine Hudgins, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan Wilson, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Donald J. Zelenka, and Assistant Attorney General Brendan J. McDonald, all of Columbia; and Solicitor Douglas A. Barfield, Jr., of Lancaster, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM

Willie James Adams, Jr. appeals his conviction for murder, arguing the trial court erred in admitting testimony regarding quantities of cocaine and cocaine base found at the murder scene. We affirm pursuant to Rule 220(b)(1), SCACR, and the following authorities: State v. Dunbar, 356 S.C. 138, 142, 587 S.E.2d 691, 693 (2003) (stating for an issue to be properly preserved for appellate review, the issue must have been raised to and ruled upon by the trial court); State v. Simpson, 325 S.C. 37, 42, 479 S.E.2d 57, 60 (1996) ("Unless an objection is made at the time the evidence is offered and a final ruling made, the issue is not preserved for review."); State v. Moultrie, 316 S.C. 547, 555-56, 451 S.E.2d 34, 39 (Ct. App. 1994) ("[A] 'failure to contemporaneously object' to the introduction of evidence claimed to be prejudicial 'cannot be later bootstrapped by a motion for a mistrial.'" (quoting State v. Lynn, 277 S.C. 222, 226, 284 S.E.2d 786, 789 (1981))).

We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

AFFIRMED.

SHORT, WILLIAMS, and GEATHERS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

State v. Adams

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals
Jan 4, 2012
Unpublished Opinion No.  2012-UP-006 (S.C. Ct. App. Jan. 4, 2012)
Case details for

State v. Adams

Case Details

Full title:The State, Respondent, v. Willie James Adams, Jr., Appellant.

Court:THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals

Date published: Jan 4, 2012

Citations

Unpublished Opinion No.  2012-UP-006 (S.C. Ct. App. Jan. 4, 2012)