applying Johnson in a juvenile delinquency proceedings and explaining that "we will disturb the juvenile court's finding that it was not persuaded that youth had met his burden of persuasion only if the record would compel every reasonable juvenile court to be persuaded that youth had met that burden"
Summary of this case from State v. WalkerA166888, (S067968)
10-22-2020
STATE v. A. L. M.
Review Denied.
applying Johnson in a juvenile delinquency proceedings and explaining that "we will disturb the juvenile court's finding that it was not persuaded that youth had met his burden of persuasion only if the record would compel every reasonable juvenile court to be persuaded that youth had met that burden"
Summary of this case from State v. WalkerFull title:STATE v. A. L. M.
Court:Supreme Court of Oregon.
Date published: Oct 22, 2020
Thus, unless the evidence in a case is such that the trial court as finder of fact could decide a particular…
State v. M. R. G.-E. (In re M. R. G.-E.)We will reverse a juvenile court's finding that it was not persuaded by the evidence "only if the record…