From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stanley v. State

Court of Appeals of Nevada
Jan 26, 2022
No. 83420-COA (Nev. App. Jan. 26, 2022)

Opinion

83420-COA

01-26-2022

OSCAR ART STANLEY, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent,


UNPUBLISHED OPINION

ORDER OF AFFIRMANCE

Gibbons, C.J.

Oscar Art Stanley appeals from an order of the district court denying a motion to modify or correct an illegal sentence filed on June 28, 2021, a motion for the appointment of counsel filed on May 25, 2021, and a motion to stop restitution filed on May 13, 2021. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Kathleen E. Delaney, Judge.

Stanley argues that the district court erred by denying his motion to modify or correct an illegal sentence. In his motion, Stanley claimed the sentencing court violated his equal protection rights by sentencing him pursuant to the habitual criminal enhancement without first imposing sentence for his primary offenses. Stanley's claim fell outside the narrow scope of claims permissible in a motion to modify or correct an illegal sentence. See Edwards v. State, 112 Nev. 704, 708, 918 P.2d 321, 324 (1996). Therefore, without considering the merits of the claim raised in the motion, we conclude the district court did not err by denying the motion. Accordingly, we

ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.

We conclude the district court did not err by denying Stanley's motion for the appointment of counsel and his motion to stop restitution.

Gibbons, C.J., Tao, J. Bulla, J.

Hon. Kathleen E. Delaney, District Judge


Summaries of

Stanley v. State

Court of Appeals of Nevada
Jan 26, 2022
No. 83420-COA (Nev. App. Jan. 26, 2022)
Case details for

Stanley v. State

Case Details

Full title:OSCAR ART STANLEY, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent,

Court:Court of Appeals of Nevada

Date published: Jan 26, 2022

Citations

No. 83420-COA (Nev. App. Jan. 26, 2022)