From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stanley v. Block

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 1, 1900
56 App. Div. 549 (N.Y. App. Div. 1900)

Opinion

December Term, 1900.

Howard E. White, for the appellants.

Hugo Hirsh, for the respondents.


This action is brought to recover $1,500, the amount of a promissory note made and indorsed by the defendants to the plaintiffs. The note was made and "given pursuant to the terms of a contract, bearing even date herewith, between the parties hereto and Joseph Butcher and J. Edmund Stanley, and is subject to all the covenants and conditions therein contained." The complaint alleges performance of all the conditions of the contract to be performed by the plaintiffs. The defendants make a general denial, and allege that "the plaintiffs have failed to perform the conditions of the contract annexed to the said complaint," etc. The plaintiffs moved for a "verified bill of particulars showing fully and in detail the manners, parts, particulars and items in which defendants claim the plaintiffs, or either of them, have failed to perform the conditions of the contract," and from the order granting such motion appeal comes to this court.

We are of opinion that the matter as thus presented comes within the decision rendered in the case of Goddard v. Pardee Medicine Co. (52 Hun, 85), and that the order was improperly granted. (See Bennett v. Wardell, 43 Hun, 452; King v. Ross, 21 App. Div. 475; Strebell v. Furber Co., 2 Misc Rep. 450, and authorities there cited; Bainbridge v. Friedlander, 7 id. 227.)

The order appealed from should be reversed, with costs.

All concurred.

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs.


Summaries of

Stanley v. Block

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 1, 1900
56 App. Div. 549 (N.Y. App. Div. 1900)
Case details for

Stanley v. Block

Case Details

Full title:J. EDMUND STANLEY and JOSEPH BUTCHER, Respondents, v . JOHN W. BLOCK and…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 1, 1900

Citations

56 App. Div. 549 (N.Y. App. Div. 1900)
67 N.Y.S. 471

Citing Cases

Smith v. Anderson

The rule still obtains that where the pleading specifies the nature of the claim, that is sufficient, and the…

Newman v. West

Plaintiff insists that the defendant's answer is practically a general denial and that consequently he is not…