From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

King v. Ross

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 1, 1897
21 App. Div. 475 (N.Y. App. Div. 1897)

Opinion

October Term, 1897.

Norman G. Johnson, for the appellant.

Richard L. Sweezy, for the respondents.

Present — VAN BRUNT, P.J., BARRETT, RUMSEY, WILLIAMS and PATTERSON, JJ.


The order should be reversed on the ground that the answer contains only admissions and denials, and, therefore, no bill of particulars can be ordered to be made by the defendant.


Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs.


Summaries of

King v. Ross

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 1, 1897
21 App. Div. 475 (N.Y. App. Div. 1897)
Case details for

King v. Ross

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM DEHON KING and Others, Respondents, v . EUGENIA A. WEBSTER ROSS…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Oct 1, 1897

Citations

21 App. Div. 475 (N.Y. App. Div. 1897)
47 N.Y.S. 562

Citing Cases

Stanley v. Block

We are of opinion that the matter as thus presented comes within the decision rendered in the case of Goddard…

Newman v. West

Plaintiff insists that the defendant's answer is practically a general denial and that consequently he is not…