From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sprinkle v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Oct 12, 1967
203 So. 2d 48 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1967)

Opinion

No. I-343.

October 12, 1967.

Appeal from the Criminal Court of Record, Duval County, Hans G. Tanzler, Jr., J.

T. Edward Austin, Jr., Public Defender, and James L. Harrison, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., and Raymond L. Marky, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.


This is an appeal from a conviction of robbery.

The only point on appeal in this case concerns the failure of the trial judge to instruct the jury on the lesser included offense of larceny.

This Court heretofore handed down its decisions in Hand v. State and Raulerson v. State in which we held that Florida Statutes 919.16, F.S.A. did not mandatorily require the giving of a charge on larceny in a robbery trial where the evidence of the particular case would not support a conviction of the said lesser offense. We were reversed by the Florida Supreme Court in the Hand and Raulerson case, supra, and we therefore have no alternative except to accept the Florida Supreme Court's decision on the matter as the law of this state until changed or modified. Therefore said case is reversed and the cause remanded for a new trial.

Hand v. State, Raulerson v. State, 199 So.2d 100 (Fla. 1967).

WIGGINTON, C.J., and JOHNSON and SPECTOR, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Sprinkle v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Oct 12, 1967
203 So. 2d 48 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1967)
Case details for

Sprinkle v. State

Case Details

Full title:JAMES LLOYD SPRINKLE, JR., APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Oct 12, 1967

Citations

203 So. 2d 48 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1967)

Citing Cases

Edwards v. State

Finding that defendants' requests were properly made and should have been granted under the decision and for…