From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sprague v. Colvin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
Dec 1, 2016
CIVIL ACTION NO. 15-13085-RGS (D. Mass. Dec. 1, 2016)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 15-13085-RGS

12-01-2016

DAVID SPRAGUE v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, ACTING COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Plaintiff David Sprague appeals the Commissioner of Social Security's decision finding that he is not disabled within the meaning of the Social Security Act and is therefore ineligible for disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income. Sprague objects to the Administrative Law Judge's (ALJ) Step 2 finding that his alleged mental disorders are non-severe. Administrative Record (AR) at 15; Appellant's Mem. at 5.

After a careful analysis of the record, Magistrate Judge Boal recommended that the case be remanded for further consideration by the ALJ. She found it unclear from the ALJ's references to "Mr. Khaira" whether he understood that Dr. Simreet Khaira, one of Sprague's care providers, is in fact a licensed psychiatrists whose opinion deserves some deference in the disability analysis. The Magistrate Judge also noted that the ALJ, and ultimately the Commissioner, mistakenly faulted Dr. Khaira for failing to opine as to Sprague's functional limitations where clearly she had. AR at 422. MJ Boal also points out that there are pages missing from Dr. Khaira's report.

Magistrate Judge Boal pointed out "that the Step 2 severity requirement is . . . to be a de minimis policy, designed to do no more than screen out groundless claims. . . . [A] finding of 'non-severe' is only to be made where 'medical evidence establishes only a slight abnormality . . . which would have no more than a minimal effect on an individual's ability to work . . . .'" R&R at 13, quoting McDonald v. Sec'y of Health & Human Servs., 795 F.2d 1118, 1124 (1st Cir. 1986). Therefore, it is important that the court confirm that the ALJ gave full consideration to Sprague's complete medical record. See Heggarty v. Sullivan, 947 F.2d 990, 997 (1st Cir. 1991)

As I agree with Magistrate Judge Boal as to the deficiencies in the record on appeal, I will adopt her recommendation and remand the case to the Commissioner for further consideration.

Neither party has filed an objection to the Magistrate Judge's R&R. --------

ORDER

The Recommendation is ADOPTED and the case is REMANDED to the Commissioner for further consideration of the issues addressed in Magistrate Judge Boal's R&R.

SO ORDERED.

/s/ Richard G. Stearns

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Sprague v. Colvin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
Dec 1, 2016
CIVIL ACTION NO. 15-13085-RGS (D. Mass. Dec. 1, 2016)
Case details for

Sprague v. Colvin

Case Details

Full title:DAVID SPRAGUE v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, ACTING COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

Date published: Dec 1, 2016

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 15-13085-RGS (D. Mass. Dec. 1, 2016)