From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Spence v. Kaur

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jul 30, 2021
2:16-cv-1828 TLN KJN P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 30, 2021)

Opinion

2:16-cv-1828 TLN KJN P

07-30-2021

GERALD SPENCE, Plaintiff, v. G. KAUR, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

KENDALL J. NEWMAN UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Plaintiff, a state prisoner, proceeds pro se. In response to the April 9, 2021 order, plaintiff provided questions to pose to putative witnesses. Subsequently, the court ordered the Clerk to serve questions on eight putative witnesses, and requested each witness respond within 60 days. Sixty days have now passed, and the court received notices from four inmates.

Because plaintiff does not have access to the electronic docket, the Clerk is directed to send plaintiff copies of the inmates' responses, as follows: the first page of the first three inmates' notices; all three pages of inmate Johnson's notice. (ECF No. 140-1, 141-1, 142-1 and 143 (all 3 pages).)

Some of the inmates appended a copy of the CDC 128B completed by defendant Kaur, which plaintiff already has.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is directed to send plaintiff copies of the inmates' responses. (ECF No. 140-1, 141-1, 142-1 and 143 (3 pages).)


Summaries of

Spence v. Kaur

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jul 30, 2021
2:16-cv-1828 TLN KJN P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 30, 2021)
Case details for

Spence v. Kaur

Case Details

Full title:GERALD SPENCE, Plaintiff, v. G. KAUR, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jul 30, 2021

Citations

2:16-cv-1828 TLN KJN P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 30, 2021)