From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Speir v. Henry

Supreme Court of South Carolina
Jun 17, 1997
326 S.C. 268 (S.C. 1997)

Opinion

June 17, 1997


ORDER

Petitioner seeks a writ of certiorari to review an order of the Court of Appeals reinstating respondent's appeal in this matter. Pursuant to Rule 226 (a), SCACR, this Court will review only final decisions of the Court of Appeals. Since the order reinstating the appeal is not a final decision in the matter, the petition for a writ of certiorari is denied.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

/s/ Ernest A. Finney, Jr., C.J. /s/ Jean H. Toal, A.J. /s/ James E. Moore, A.J. /s/ John H. Waller, Jr., A.J. /s/ E.C. Burnette, III, A.J.


Summaries of

Speir v. Henry

Supreme Court of South Carolina
Jun 17, 1997
326 S.C. 268 (S.C. 1997)
Case details for

Speir v. Henry

Case Details

Full title:Aiken Speir, Inc., Petitioner, v. Levern Henry, United States of America…

Court:Supreme Court of South Carolina

Date published: Jun 17, 1997

Citations

326 S.C. 268 (S.C. 1997)
486 S.E.2d 492

Citing Cases

Koon v. Clare

The rationale behind those decisions applies equally to situations where a litigant who is represented by…

Assa'ad-Faltas v. South Carolina

[App. 783 (citing Rule 242(a) and (c), SCACR; Aiken Speir, Inc. v. Henry, 486 S.E.2d 492 (1997)).]…