From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Spearman v. Bell

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LUFKIN DIVISION
Sep 22, 2015
CIVIL ACTION NO. 9:13-CV-290 (E.D. Tex. Sep. 22, 2015)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 9:13-CV-290

09-22-2015

EDDY LEE SPEARMAN v. CHARLES W. BELL, et al.


MEMORANDUM ORDER OVERRULING OBJECTIONS AND ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Plaintiff, Eddy Lee Spearman, an inmate confined at the Eastham Unit of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against defendant Jimmy Locander.

Plaintiff's claims against defendants Bell, Erwin, and Coleman were dismissed by Memorandum Order and Partial Judgment on January 5, 2015. --------

The Court referred this matter to the Honorable Keith Giblin, United States Magistrate Judge, at Lufkin, Texas, for consideration pursuant to applicable laws and orders of this Court. The Magistrate Judge recommends defendant Locander's motion to dismiss as to plaintiff's official capacity claims be granted but denied as to plaintiff's claims of deliberate indifference.

The Court has received and considered the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge filed pursuant to such order, along with the record, and pleadings. Plaintiff filed objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation. This requires a de novo review of the objections in relation to the pleadings and applicable law. See FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b).

After a careful review, the Court finds the objections lacking in merit. As outlined by the Magistrate Judge, plaintiff's claims against defendant Locander in her official capacity are barred by Eleventh Amendment immunity. See Buckhannon Bd. and Care Home, Inc. v. W. Va. Dep't of Health and Human Res., 532 U.S. 598, 609 n. 10 (2001). However, plaintiff's claims against defendant Locander in her individual capacity for deliberate indifference shall proceed.

ORDER

Accordingly, the objections of plaintiff are OVERRULED. The findings of fact and conclusions of law of the Magistrate Judge are correct and the report of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED. SIGNED this 22nd day of September, 2015.

/s/_________

MICHAEL H. SCHNEIDER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Spearman v. Bell

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LUFKIN DIVISION
Sep 22, 2015
CIVIL ACTION NO. 9:13-CV-290 (E.D. Tex. Sep. 22, 2015)
Case details for

Spearman v. Bell

Case Details

Full title:EDDY LEE SPEARMAN v. CHARLES W. BELL, et al.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LUFKIN DIVISION

Date published: Sep 22, 2015

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 9:13-CV-290 (E.D. Tex. Sep. 22, 2015)