Summary
holding that the plaintiff is entitled to a jury trial to determine liability and back pay
Summary of this case from Frizzell v. Southwest Motor FreightOpinion
No. 4:CV95-3407.
April 17, 1997.
Susan M. Ugai, Ugai Lindgren, Lincoln, NE, for Plaintiff.
Robert F. Rossiter, Jr., Fraser, Stryker, Vaughn, Meusey, Olson, Boyer Bloch, P.C., Omaha, NE, for Defendant.
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
The pretrial conference order in this case presents the question of whether the plaintiff is entitled to a jury trial in this Family and Medical Leave Act case. I conclude that as to liability and back pay, the plaintiff is entitled to a jury trial. Helmly v. Stone Container Corp., 957 F. Supp. 1274 (S.D.Ga. 1997). As to equitable issues such as reinstatement and front pay, I conclude that those issues are for the court. Cf., Newhouse v. McCormick Co., Inc., 110 F.3d 635 (8th Cir. 1997).
IT IS SO ORDERED.