From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sosa v. McGrath

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Jan 27, 2006
164 F. App'x 642 (9th Cir. 2006)

Opinion

Submitted Jan. 23, 2006.

This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION. (See Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure Rule 36-3)

Alfred R. Sosa, Crescent City, CA, pro se.


Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, Marilyn H. Patel, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CV-05-00120-MHP.

Before: T.G. NELSON, SILVERMAN and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

A review of the record and the opening brief indicates that the questions raised in this appeal are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (stating standard).

Accordingly, we summarily affirm the district court's judgment.

All pending motions are denied as moot.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Sosa v. McGrath

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Jan 27, 2006
164 F. App'x 642 (9th Cir. 2006)
Case details for

Sosa v. McGrath

Case Details

Full title:Alfred R. SOSA, Plaintiff--Appellant, v. Joe MCGRATH, Warden; et al.…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Jan 27, 2006

Citations

164 F. App'x 642 (9th Cir. 2006)