From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. Wiggins

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Sep 28, 2022
No. 21-1382 (4th Cir. Sep. 28, 2022)

Opinion

21-1382

09-28-2022

ROGER VANN SMITH, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. NEIL F. WIGGINS, Clerk of Superior Court, Gates County, Defendant-Appellee.

Roger Vann Smith, Appellant Pro Se.


UNPUBLISHED

Submitted: August 30, 2022

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Elizabeth City. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (2:21-cv-00009-BO)

Roger Vann Smith, Appellant Pro Se.

Before RICHARDSON, RUSHING, and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM

Roger Vann Smith appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) for failure to plead sufficient facts to state a claim. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny the pending motion and affirm the district court's order. See Smith v. Wiggins, No. 2:21-cv-00009-BO (E.D. N.C. Apr. 1, 2021). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

Smith v. Wiggins

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Sep 28, 2022
No. 21-1382 (4th Cir. Sep. 28, 2022)
Case details for

Smith v. Wiggins

Case Details

Full title:ROGER VANN SMITH, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. NEIL F. WIGGINS, Clerk of…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Sep 28, 2022

Citations

No. 21-1382 (4th Cir. Sep. 28, 2022)

Citing Cases

Jett v. Woodard

Here, Plaintiffs have only made conclusory allegations against Amanda Parker that are insufficient to state a…