From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. Metropolitan Dade County

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Mar 31, 1977
343 So. 2d 653 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1977)

Opinion

No. 76-115.

March 1, 1977. Rehearing Denied March 31, 1977.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Dade County, Francis X. Knuck, J.

Kuvin, Klingensmith Lewis, Coconut Grove, Gaine Gaine, Miami, for appellants.

Stuart L. Simon, County Atty., and James G. Roth and James K. Kracht, Asst. County Attys., for appellee.

Before HENDRY, C.J., and PEARSON and HAVERFIELD, JJ.


Plaintiffs appeal from a summary final judgment in favor of defendant, Dade County, in this personal injury action.

Prior to the date of the subject accident, the County removed a traffic control device located on the Northwest side of 22 Avenue just South of 69 Lane. However, the County failed to remove the base of the device and on October 14, 1974, while walking along the sidewalk, Tangela Smith sustained injury when the metal base penetrated her leg. Tangela Smith, a minor, by her mother Delores Walker and Delores Walker, individually filed suit against the County to recover damages. Subsequently, the County filed a motion for summary judgment along with an affidavit of Lucian C. Cantin, its insurance division manager, who stated that the County has no insurance covering this type of claim. After hearing argument, the trial judge granted the motion and entered summary judgment for the County. We affirm.

Dade County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, enjoys governmental immunity from suit unless it waives such immunity by the acquisition of insurance. Kaulakis v. Boyd, 138 So.2d 505 (Fla. 1962); Arnold v. Shumpert, 217 So.2d 116 (Fla. 1968); Brandeis v. Dade County, 226 So.2d 873 (Fla. 3d DCA 1969); Schmauss v. Snoll, 245 So.2d 112 (Fla. 3d DCA 1971). It affirmatively appears from the record that there is no insurance coverage as plaintiffs' complaint as well as Cantin's affidavit so states.

It is to be noted that the waiver of immunity statute, § 768.28, Fla. Stat. (1973) became effective on January 1, 1975 [§ 768.30, Fla. Stat. (1973)] and, thus, is not applicable to the instant case.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Smith v. Metropolitan Dade County

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Mar 31, 1977
343 So. 2d 653 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1977)
Case details for

Smith v. Metropolitan Dade County

Case Details

Full title:TANGELA SMITH, A MINOR, BY HER MOTHER AND NEXT FRIEND DELORES WALKER AND…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Mar 31, 1977

Citations

343 So. 2d 653 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1977)

Citing Cases

McPhee v. Dade County

This court has recently held, in three cases, that Dade County is not liable in tort. See and compare: Smith…

Collier v. Dade County

It is this "constitutional immunity from suit," without regard to whether the county is engaged in a…