Opinion
CIVIL ACTION No.: 06-5290.
September 30, 2010
ORDER
AND NOW, this 30th day of September, 2010, it is ORDERED Defendant City of Bethlehem's Renewed Motion for Attorneys' Fees and Costs Under 42 U.S.C. § 1988 (Document 49) is DENIED.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Smith v. City of Bethlehem
United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Sep 30, 2010
CIVIL ACTION No.: 06-5290 (E.D. Pa. Sep. 30, 2010)
Summaries of
Smith v. City of Bethlehem
United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Sep 30, 2010
CIVIL ACTION No.: 06-5290 (E.D. Pa. Sep. 30, 2010)
Case details for
Smith v. City of Bethlehem
Case Details
Full title:JUSTIN SMITH v. CITY OF BETHLEHEM, et al
Court:United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Date published: Sep 30, 2010
Citations
CIVIL ACTION No.: 06-5290 (E.D. Pa. Sep. 30, 2010)
Citing Cases
Smith v. V.I. Port Auth.
The ultimate question is "whether the case is so lacking in arguable merit as to be groundless or without…