From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. Annucci

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Mar 19, 2015
126 A.D.3d 1198 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)

Opinion

2015-03-19

In the Matter of Jessie SMITH, Petitioner, v. Anthony J. ANNUCCI, as Acting Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision, Respondent.

Jessie Smith, Sonyea, petitioner pro se. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Peter H. Schiff of counsel), for respondent.


Jessie Smith, Sonyea, petitioner pro se. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Peter H. Schiff of counsel), for respondent.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Petitioner was charged in a misbehavior report with committing an unhygienic act and disobeying a direct order. The misbehavior report relates that, during a strip search, petitioner notified the correction officer that he needed to use the restroom. Although the correction officer directed petitioner to continue with the strip search, petitioner urinated on himself and the floor. At the ensuing tier III disciplinary hearing, petitioner initially pleaded not guilty to the charges but subsequently changed his plea to guilty. Petitioner was found guilty of the charges and that determination was affirmed upon administrative appeal. Petitioner then commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding.

We confirm. Given petitioner's plea of guilty to the charges, he is precluded from challenging the sufficiency of the evidence supporting the determination of guilt ( see Matter of Campbell v. Bedard, 123 A.D.3d 1278, 1278, 998 N.Y.S.2d 529 [2014]; Matter of Gonzalez v. Annucci, 122 A.D.3d 1203, 1204, 995 N.Y.S.2d 859 [2014] ). Furthermore, to the extent that petitioner claims that he did not recant his original plea of not guilty to the charges, the record clearly belies this contention. In any event, substantial evidence in the form of the misbehavior report and hearing testimony supports the determination of guilt. Although petitioner asserts that he is incontinent, there is no medical evidence in the record to support his contention and, under such circumstances, petitioner's explanation presented a credibility issue for the Hearing Officer to resolve ( see Matter of Redmond v. Fischer, 116 A.D.3d 1304, 1304, 983 N.Y.S.2d 907 [2014] ).

ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed. LAHTINEN, J.P., ROSE, EGAN JR. and LYNCH, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Smith v. Annucci

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Mar 19, 2015
126 A.D.3d 1198 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)
Case details for

Smith v. Annucci

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Jessie SMITH, Petitioner, v. Anthony J. ANNUCCI, as…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.

Date published: Mar 19, 2015

Citations

126 A.D.3d 1198 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)
126 A.D.3d 1198
2015 N.Y. Slip Op. 2164
2015 N.Y. Slip Op. 0

Citing Cases

Vega v. Prack

of Clark v. Fischer, 114 A.D.3d 1116, 1116, 981 N.Y.S.2d 187 [2014] ). Petitioner alleges that he was unable…

Simmons v. Prack

Initially, the Attorney General concedes, and we agree, that, because the charges of possession of contraband…