From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Campbell v. Bedard

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Dec 11, 2014
123 A.D.3d 1278 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)

Opinion

2014-12-11

In the Matter of Erick M. CAMPBELL, Petitioner, v. Corey BEDARD, as Acting Director of Special Housing and Inmate Disciplinary Programs, Respondent.



Erick M. Campbell, Attica, petitioner pro se.

Before: PETERS, P.J., McCARTHY, GARRY, EGAN JR. and DEVINE, JJ.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

Petitioner was charged in a misbehavior report with drug use after his urine twice tested positive for buprenorphine. Petitioner pleaded guilty to the charge with the explanation that he has a severe drug problem. At the conclusion of the tier III disciplinary hearing, the Hearing Officer found petitioner guilty as charged. Following an unsuccessful administrative appeal, petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding.

We confirm. Given petitioner's plea of guilty with an explanation, he is precluded from challenging the sufficiency of the evidence supporting the determination of guilt ( see Matter of Fields v. Prack, 120 A.D.3d 1510, 992 N.Y.S.2d 458 [2014]; Matter of Robinson v. Prack, 119 A.D.3d 1309, 1309, 989 N.Y.S.2d 707 [2014] ). To the extent that petitioner contends that he was incompetent to adequately participate in the hearing, the confidential testimony establishes that the Hearing Officer properly considered petitioner's mental health status and ability to participate in the hearing ( see Matter of Lashway v. Fischer, 110 A.D.3d 1420, 1420, 973 N.Y.S.2d 496 [2013]; Matter of Sabino v. Prack, 101 A.D.3d 1202, 1203, 955 N.Y.S.2d 674 [2012] ). Petitioner's remaining contentions have been reviewed and are either unpersuasive or unpreserved for our review.

ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.


Summaries of

Campbell v. Bedard

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Dec 11, 2014
123 A.D.3d 1278 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)
Case details for

Campbell v. Bedard

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Erick M. CAMPBELL, Petitioner, v. Corey BEDARD, as Acting…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.

Date published: Dec 11, 2014

Citations

123 A.D.3d 1278 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)
123 A.D.3d 1278
2014 N.Y. Slip Op. 8705

Citing Cases

Smith v. Annucci

At the ensuing tier III disciplinary hearing, petitioner initially pleaded not guilty to the charges but…

Medina v. Venettozzi

We confirm. Petitioner's plea of guilty with an explanation precludes a challenge to the sufficiency of the…