From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Singh v. G a Mounting Die Cutting

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 18, 2002
292 A.D.2d 516 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)

Opinion

2001-06254

Submitted February 14, 2002.

March 18, 2002.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant U.S. Electrical Motors, a Division of Emerson Electric Co., appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (LeVine, J.), dated June 5, 2001, which granted the plaintiffs' motion to strike a notice to admit dated January 16, 2001, and to quash a subpoena served on their attorney.

Quirk Bakalor, P.C., New York, N.Y. (Richard H. Bakalor and Anne E. Pettit of counsel), for appellant.

Berel Mullen, P.C., New York, N.Y. (Peter P. Sweeney of counsel), for respondents.

Before: FRED T. SANTUCCI, J.P., NANCY E. SMITH, GLORIA GOLDSTEIN, WILLIAM D. FRIEDMANN, JJ.


ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly granted that branch of the plaintiffs' motion which was to strike the notice to admit dated January 16, 2001, since several of the demands contained therein sought "admissions as to material and ultimate issues" (Kimmel v. Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton Garrison, 214 A.D.2d 453; see, Berg v. Flower Fifth Ave. Hosp., 102 A.D.2d 760). Furthermore, a notice to admit is not to be used "as a substitute for existing discovery devices" (Jonas v. Liberty Lines Tr., 142 A.D.2d 554, 555), or as "a subterfuge for obtaining further discovery" (Hodes v. City of New York, 165 A.D.2d 168, 171).

The Supreme Court properly granted that branch of the plaintiffs' motion which was to quash the subpoena served on their attorney, since the appellant sought to compel that attorney to testify at trial about confidential matters (see, CPLR 4503[a]).

SANTUCCI, J.P., SMITH, GOLDSTEIN and FRIEDMANN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Singh v. G a Mounting Die Cutting

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 18, 2002
292 A.D.2d 516 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
Case details for

Singh v. G a Mounting Die Cutting

Case Details

Full title:SOOKNANDAN SINGH, ET AL., respondents, v. G A MOUNTING DIE CUTTING, INC.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 18, 2002

Citations

292 A.D.2d 516 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
739 N.Y.S.2d 578

Citing Cases

Winitch v. 150 TT RGG LLC

It is settled law that a Notice to Admit is improper when it is used to obtain conclusions of "material and…

U.S. Bank Nat'Lass'N v. Glusky

Issues which go to the heart of the matter are not the proper subjects for a notice to admit and should be…