From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sigler v. a B Automotive

Oregon Court of Appeals
Jun 29, 1994
877 P.2d 126 (Or. Ct. App. 1994)

Opinion

91-14416; CA A80712

Argued and submitted May 20, 1994.

Reversed and remanded for reconsideration June 29, 1994.

Judicial Review from Workers' Compensation Board.

Scott Lumsden argued the cause for petitioner. On the brief was Michael R. Dehner.

Alexander D. Libmann argued the cause and filed the brief for respondents.

Before Rossman, Presiding Judge, and Richardson, Chief Judge, and Leeson, Judge.


PER CURIAM

Reversed and remanded for reconsideration.


Claimant seeks review of a Workers' Compensation Board order denying her compensation. The Board's determination that she failed to prove entitlement to an award of impairment is supported by substantial evidence. Claimant concedes that our recent decision in Hathaway v. Health Future Enterprises, 125 Or. App. 549, 865 P.2d 503, rev allowed 319 Or. 80 (1994), requires that we reject her third assignment of error. The only remaining question is whether the Board erred in declining to consider a medical report claimant submitted after issuance of an order on reconsideration. We conclude that it did and reverse.

In December, 1990, claimant injured her neck in a work-related automobile accident. The claim was closed on May 15, 1991, with no award for permanent partial disability. An October 15, 1991, order on reconsideration affirmed. Claimant requested a hearing, at which she submitted a medical report prepared on December 31, 1991. The referee affirmed the order. On appeal, the Board, relying on ORS 656.268(7), refused to consider the December 31, 1991, medical report.

We have held that there is no limitation on a claimant's right to submit evidence at hearing. ORS 656.283(7); Scheller v. Holly House, 125 Or. App. 454, 457, 865 P.2d 475 (1993), rev den 319 Or. 36 (1994); Safeway Stores, Inc. v. Smith, 122 Or. App. 160, 163, 857 P.2d 187 (1993). The Board erred in refusing to consider the December 31, 1991, medical report.

No medical arbiter was appointed; the only question involves whether the evidence is admissible under ORS 656.283(7).

Reversed and remanded for reconsideration.


Summaries of

Sigler v. a B Automotive

Oregon Court of Appeals
Jun 29, 1994
877 P.2d 126 (Or. Ct. App. 1994)
Case details for

Sigler v. a B Automotive

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Compensation of Tamara Sigler, Claimant. Tamara…

Court:Oregon Court of Appeals

Date published: Jun 29, 1994

Citations

877 P.2d 126 (Or. Ct. App. 1994)
877 P.2d 126