From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Petitions for Review

Oregon Supreme Court
Jan 1, 1994
319 Or. 80 (Or. 1994)

Summary

holding that, under Pratt , a conviction following the issuance of an indictment by fewer than seven jurors only renders the conviction voidable and, thus, does not constitute a basis for post-conviction relief

Summary of this case from Aguilar v. State

Opinion

1994.


Summaries of

Petitions for Review

Oregon Supreme Court
Jan 1, 1994
319 Or. 80 (Or. 1994)

holding that, under Pratt , a conviction following the issuance of an indictment by fewer than seven jurors only renders the conviction voidable and, thus, does not constitute a basis for post-conviction relief

Summary of this case from Aguilar v. State

affirming directed verdict for defendant in negligence case on ground that, among other things, there was "no evidence that, at any time before the fall, defendant's employees actually knew that ice or water had been spilled on the floor"

Summary of this case from Lourim v. Swensen

requiring clear and convincing evidence to establish constructive trust

Summary of this case from Shields v. Villareal

describing theories under which an invitee can recover for slipping and falling on a foreign substance on business property

Summary of this case from Howard v. Kienow's Food Stores, Inc.
Case details for

Petitions for Review

Case Details

Full title:PETITIONS FOR REVIEW

Court:Oregon Supreme Court

Date published: Jan 1, 1994

Citations

319 Or. 80 (Or. 1994)

Citing Cases

State v. Conger

Although petitioner's failure to preserve the grand jury issue does not preclude him from raising it as a…

Boyd v. Boyd

Service at the bookkeeper's office afforded the court personal jurisdiction over father, because it was…