From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sides v. Stephens

STATE OF TEXAS IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS
Apr 16, 2015
No. 10-15-00104-CV (Tex. App. Apr. 16, 2015)

Opinion

No. 10-15-00104-CV

04-16-2015

THOMAS RAY SIDES, Appellant v. WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR T.D.C.J.-I.D., Appellee


From Coryell County, Texas

ORDER

Thomas Ray Sides's appeal was dismissed for want of jurisdiction on April 2, 2015. He has since filed a "Motion to Suspend Rule 9.5 'Tex. Rules App. Pro. 9.5' Copy Rule" and a motion for an extension of time to an application to proceed "in forma pauperis."

The "copy" rule is actually Rule 9.3 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure.

Since there is still time for Sides to file a motion for rehearing of his dismissal, his motion to suspend the copy rule is granted. Sides is only required to file one copy. Sides is reminded he must still serve a copy of all pleadings on the appellee. See TEX. R. APP. P. 9.5(a), (d), (e).

Because we do not have jurisdiction of Sides's appeal and have dismissed that appeal, and whether he proceeded as a pauper or not, Sides would, nevertheless, owe the filing fee. Accordingly, Sides's motion to extend the time to file an application to proceed "in forma pauperis" is denied.

PER CURIAM Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Davis, and Justice Scoggins
Motion to suspend granted
Motion to extend time denied
Order issued and filed April 16, 2015


Summaries of

Sides v. Stephens

STATE OF TEXAS IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS
Apr 16, 2015
No. 10-15-00104-CV (Tex. App. Apr. 16, 2015)
Case details for

Sides v. Stephens

Case Details

Full title:THOMAS RAY SIDES, Appellant v. WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR T.D.C.J.-I.D.…

Court:STATE OF TEXAS IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

Date published: Apr 16, 2015

Citations

No. 10-15-00104-CV (Tex. App. Apr. 16, 2015)