From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Shuttlesworth v. City of Birmingham

Supreme Court of Alabama
Feb 28, 1963
149 So. 2d 923 (Ala. 1963)

Opinion

6 Div. 940.

December 20, 1962. Rehearing Denied February 28, 1963.

Appeal from the Court of Appeals, 149 So.2d 921

Peter A. Hall and Orzell Billingsley, Jr., Birmingham, for petitioner.

Wm. C. Walker, Birmingham, opposed.


The petition for certiorari to the Court of Appeals must be stricken because it is not on transcript paper. Supreme Court Rule 32; Ex parte Cranmore, 273 Ala. 4, 129 So.2d 688; Ex parte Davis, 269 Ala. 58, 110 So.2d 306; Accardo v. State, 268 Ala. 293, 105 So.2d 865; McDonald v. Amason, 267 Ala. 654, 104 So.2d 719; Ladd v. State, 266 Ala. 586, 98 So.2d 59.

Petition for writ of certiorari stricken.

LIVINGSTON, C. J., and SIMPSON and HARWOOD, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Shuttlesworth v. City of Birmingham

Supreme Court of Alabama
Feb 28, 1963
149 So. 2d 923 (Ala. 1963)
Case details for

Shuttlesworth v. City of Birmingham

Case Details

Full title:Fred L. SHUTTLESWORTH v. CITY OF BIRMINGHAM

Court:Supreme Court of Alabama

Date published: Feb 28, 1963

Citations

149 So. 2d 923 (Ala. 1963)
149 So. 2d 923

Citing Cases

Boyd v. State

We have no alternative but to strike the petition because it is not on transcript paper. Supreme Court Rule…