From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cranmore v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama
May 18, 1961
129 So. 2d 688 (Ala. 1961)

Opinion

1 Div. 966.

April 6, 1961. Rehearing Denied May 18, 1961.

Appeal from the Court of Appeals, 129 So.2d 686.

B. F. Stokes, III, Mobile, for petitioner.

MacDonald Gallion, Atty. Gen., and David W. Clark, Asst. Atty. Gen., opposed.


The petition for certiorari to the Court of Appeals must be stricken because it is not on transcript paper. Supreme Court Rule 32; Ladd v. State, 266 Ala. 586, 98 So.2d 59.

Moreover, no errors are specified or assigned in the petition for writ of certiorari. This renders the petition insufficient to invite a review. Burton v. State, 267 Ala. 354, 101 So.2d 572; Davenport-Harris Funeral Home, Inc. v. Chandler, 264 Ala. 623, 88 So.2d 878.

Writ denied.

LIVINGSTON, C. J., and LAWSON and STAKELY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Cranmore v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama
May 18, 1961
129 So. 2d 688 (Ala. 1961)
Case details for

Cranmore v. State

Case Details

Full title:Henry Mark CRANMORE v. STATE of Alabama

Court:Supreme Court of Alabama

Date published: May 18, 1961

Citations

129 So. 2d 688 (Ala. 1961)
129 So. 2d 688

Citing Cases

Shuttlesworth v. City of Birmingham

The petition for certiorari to the Court of Appeals must be stricken because it is not on transcript paper.…