Shulman v. U.S.

Full title: Carol Lee SHULMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America; et…

Court: United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Jul 30, 2002

43 F. App'x 128 (9th Cir. 2002)

Opinion

43 Fed.Appx. 128 (9th Cir. 2002) Carol Lee SHULMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America; et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 01-55070. D.C. No. CV-00-12455-IFP. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. July 30, 2002

Submitted July 22, 2002 ^*.

* The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION. (See Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure Rule 36-3)

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Terry J. Hatter, Jr., Chief District Judge, Presiding.

Before BROWNING, KOZINSKI, and BERZON, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM ^**

** This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

Carol Lee Shulman appeals pro se the district court's denial of her application to proceed in forma pauperis. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. Shulman paid the filing fees in the district court after appealing the order denying her application to proceed in forma pauperis; therefore, her appeal is moot. See Lipscomb v. Madigan, 221 F.2d 798, 798 (9th Cir.1955).

DISMISSED.