From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Short v. Meza

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 25, 2005
17 A.D.3d 664 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)

Opinion

2005-00293.

April 25, 2005.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (LaCava, J.), entered December 1, 2004, as denied his motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d).

Finder, Cuomo Adler, LLP, New York, N.Y. (Matthew A. Cuomo of counsel), for appellant.

Avelino Associates, P.C., New York, N.Y. (Andrew P. Nitkewicz of counsel), for respondent.

Before: H. Miller, J.P., S. Miller, Goldstein, Mastro and Lifson, JJ., concur.


Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

In relying on reports of doctors which indicated a possible disc herniation and diminution of range of motion causally related to the subject accident, the defendant failed to make a prima facie showing of entitlement to judgment as a matter of law on the issue of whether the plaintiff sustained a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d). Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly denied the defendant's motion ( see Kearse v. New York City Tr. Auth., 16 AD3d 45; Boone v. New York City Tr. Auth., 263 AD2d 463; see also Toure v. Avis Rent A Car Sys., 98 NY2d 345; cf. Meely v. 4 G's Truck Renting Co., 16 AD3d 26).


Summaries of

Short v. Meza

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 25, 2005
17 A.D.3d 664 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
Case details for

Short v. Meza

Case Details

Full title:ELVIRA SHORT, Respondent, v. ELEUTERIO MEZA, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 25, 2005

Citations

17 A.D.3d 664 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
793 N.Y.S.2d 529

Citing Cases

Lagredelle v. Didier

The proponent of a summary judgment motion must make a prima facie showing of entitlement to judgment as a…

Lagredelle v. Didier

The proponent of a summary judgment motion must make a prima facie showing of entitlement to judgment as a…