Opinion
November 24, 1997
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (R. Goldberg, J.).
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The record is devoid of any evidence establishing that a defect in the design, installation, or maintenance of a light post was the proximate or concurring cause of the accident involved in this case ( see, Hyde v. County of Rensselaer, 51 N.Y.2d 927; Kirtoglou v. Fogarty, 235 A.D.2d 1019; Wang v. County of Rockland, 179 A.D.2d 977; DiMarco v. Verone, 147 A.D.2d 671; Crecca v. Central Hudson Gas Elec. Corp., 146 A.D.2d 858; Scotti v. Niagara Mohawk Power Corp., 136 A.D.2d 478).
Santucci, J. P., Joy, Friedmann and Luciano, JJ., concur.