From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Crecca v. Central Hudson Gas Electric Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jan 5, 1989
146 A.D.2d 858 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)

Opinion

January 5, 1989

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Greene County (Connor, J.).


Plaintiff Beatrice Crecca (hereinafter plaintiff) was severely injured when the car in which she was a passenger and which was driven by her husband struck defendants' utility pole, which was located outside the paved portion of State Route 81 in the Town of Greenville, Greene County. Plaintiff's husband testified at a deposition that he had no recollection of how the accident occurred. Plaintiff and her husband commenced this action for damages alleging that defendants' negligent placement of the pole was the cause of her injuries. After issue was joined, defendants separately moved for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Supreme Court granted the motions, holding that the pole's placement, as a matter of law, did not create an unreasonable danger to travelers and, thus, was not the proximate cause of plaintiff's injuries. This appeal followed.

We affirm. Photos in the record reveal that at the accident site State Route 81 is a paved highway with one travel lane in each direction. There is a paved shoulder about as wide as each travel lane and, at the end of the shoulder, there is a curb, then an asphalt strip in which defendants' utility pole is located, and then a sidewalk. The asphalt strip is not as wide as the sidewalk. Considering the extent of the paved area and the presence of a curb, it is apparent that travel beyond the paved portions was "neither contemplated nor foreseeable" (Tomassi v Town of Union, 46 N.Y.2d 91, 97; see, Kinne v State of New York, 8 A.D.2d 903, affd 8 N.Y.2d 1068). Defendants' placement of the pole, even if negligent, cannot be considered a proximate cause of the accident and defendants cannot therefore be held liable (see, Hyde v County of Rensselaer, 51 N.Y.2d 927, 929-930; Hayes v Malkan, 26 N.Y.2d 295, 298, n 3; see also, Scotti v Niagara Mohawk Power Corp., 136 A.D.2d 478).

Order affirmed, without costs. Mahoney, P.J., Kane, Weiss, Mikoll and Harvey, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Crecca v. Central Hudson Gas Electric Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jan 5, 1989
146 A.D.2d 858 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)
Case details for

Crecca v. Central Hudson Gas Electric Corp.

Case Details

Full title:BEATRICE CRECCA et al., Appellants, v. CENTRAL HUDSON GAS ELECTRIC…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jan 5, 1989

Citations

146 A.D.2d 858 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)

Citing Cases

Wang v. County of Rockland

Laoboonchareon offered the only first-hand account of the circumstances surrounding the accident, and it was…

Shneyer v. City of New York

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs. The record is devoid of any evidence establishing that a…