Opinion
No. SC08-203.
Date of decision or date rehearing denied (if requested).
Lower Tribunal No(s). 1D07-2066.
Because petitioner has failed to show a clear legal right to the reinstatement of his appeal at the First District Court of Appeal, he is not entitled to mandamus relief. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is hereby denied. See Huffman v. State, 813 So. 2d 10, 11 (Fla. 2000) (stating that in order to be entitled to a writ of mandamus, petitioner must show a clear legal right to the performance of the requested act, that respondent has an indisputable legal duty to perform that act, and that no other adequate remedy exists).
Petitioner's "Motion to Amend Reply for Writ of Mandamus" is hereby denied.
WELLS, ANSTEAD, PARIENTE, QUINCE, and CANTERO, JJ., concur.