From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Shadazia v. Charles

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Feb 1, 2008
48 A.D.3d 1058 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)

Opinion

No. CAF 07-00074.

February 1, 2008.

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Onondaga County (Michael L. Hanuszczak, J.), entered December 20, 2006 in a proceeding pursuant to Social Services Law § 384-b. The order, insofar as appealed from, terminated the parental rights of respondent Teneya C.

FRANK H. HISCOCK LEGAL AID SOCIETY, SYRACUSE (ROBERT P. RICKERT OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.

ANTHONY P. RIVIZZIGNO, COUNTY ATTORNEY, SYRACUSE (SARA J. LANGAN OF COUNSEL), FOR PETITIONER-RESPONDENT.

LINDA GEHRON, LAW GUARDIAN, SYRACUSE, FOR SHADAZIA W., RAYQUAN W., AND CEARRAH W.

Present: Scudder, P.J., Martoche, Centra, Fahey and Gorski, JJ.


It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: On appeal from an order adjudicating her three children to be permanently neglected and terminating her parental rights, respondent mother contends that Family Court erred in failing to issue a suspended judgment. That contention is unpreserved for our review inasmuch as the mother failed to request a suspended judgment ( see Matter of Bryce R.W., 32 AD3d 1312; Matter of Rosalinda R., 16 AD3d 1063, lv denied 5 NY3d 702).


Summaries of

Shadazia v. Charles

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Feb 1, 2008
48 A.D.3d 1058 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
Case details for

Shadazia v. Charles

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of SHADAZIA W. and Others, Infants. ONONDAGA COUNTY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Feb 1, 2008

Citations

48 A.D.3d 1058 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
2008 N.Y. Slip Op. 758
849 N.Y.S.2d 827

Citing Cases

In re Nestor H.O

Thus, contrary to the father's contention, "[a] blood relative does not take precedence over a prospective…

Cattaraugus Cnty. Dep't of Soc. Servs. v. (In re Alex C.)

Further, the record establishes that the father's only “plan” for the child was that the child remain in…