From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sey v. State

SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS
Jan 5, 2012
2012 Ark. 2 (Ark. 2012)

Opinion

No. CR 11–776.

01-05-2012

Meloni SEY, Appellant v. STATE of Arkansas, Appellee.


Appellant Meloni Sey, by and through her counsel, Courtney Cline, moves this court to file a belated brief. After a final extension of time in which to file her brief was granted by this court, Sey's brief was due on November 7, 2011. On November 1, 2011, Sey tendered a non-complying brief that our clerk rejected. On November 4, 2011, Sey filed a motion to supplement the record, which this court denied on December 1, 2011.

On December 5, 2011, Sey tendered a corrected brief, and she now asks this court to accept this belated brief. Counsel states in the motion that it was her mistaken belief and misunderstanding that the time for filing the corrected brief was stayed pending her motion to supplement the record.

We will accept a criminal appellant's belated brief to prevent an appeal from being aborted. Pennington v. State, 2011 Ark. 363 (per curiam). However, good cause must be shown to grant the motion. Id.; see also Strom v. State, 356 Ark. 224, 147 S.W.3d 689 (2004) (holding that appellate counsel's admitted failure to timely file the brief constitutes good cause to grant appellant's motion for belated brief. Counsel's fault is clear from the record and constitutes good cause). Young v. State, 372 Ark. 219, 272 S.W.3d 109 (2008) (per curiam). Accordingly, we grant the instant motion and refer the matter to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Motion granted.


Summaries of

Sey v. State

SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS
Jan 5, 2012
2012 Ark. 2 (Ark. 2012)
Case details for

Sey v. State

Case Details

Full title:MELONI SEY APPELLANT v. STATE OF ARKANSAS APPELLEE

Court:SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS

Date published: Jan 5, 2012

Citations

2012 Ark. 2 (Ark. 2012)