From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pennington v. State

SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS
Sep 15, 2011
2011 Ark. 363 (Ark. 2011)

Opinion

No. CR 11-97

09-15-2011

BRUCE WADE PENNINGTON APPELLANT v. STATE OF ARKANSAS APPELLEE


MOTION TO FILE BELATED BRIEF

GRANTED.

PER CURIAM

Appellant Bruce Wade Pennington, by and through his counsel, Dana A. Reece, moves this court to file a belated brief. After an extension of time in which to file his brief was granted by this court, Pennington's brief was due on April 6, 2011. No brief was filed, and Pennington subsequently filed two motions to file belated brief. This court denied both motions without prejudice, however, due to Pennington's failure to tender a brief. On August 31, 2011, Pennington tendered his brief and filed the instant motion.

We will accept a criminal appellant's belated brief to prevent an appeal from being aborted. See Brewton v. State, 375 Ark. 364, 290 S.W.3d 605 (2009) (per curiam). However, good cause must be shown to grant the motion. See id.; see also Strom v. State, 356 Ark. 224, 147 S.W.3d 689 (2004) (holding that appellate counsel's admitted failure to timely file the brief constituted good cause to grant appellant's motion for belated brief). While counsel Reece does not admit fault, her fault is clear from the record and constitutes good cause. See, e.g., Young v. State, 372 Ark. 219, 272 S.W.3d 109 (2008) (per curiam). Accordingly, we grant the instant motion and refer the matter to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Motion granted.


Summaries of

Pennington v. State

SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS
Sep 15, 2011
2011 Ark. 363 (Ark. 2011)
Case details for

Pennington v. State

Case Details

Full title:BRUCE WADE PENNINGTON APPELLANT v. STATE OF ARKANSAS APPELLEE

Court:SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS

Date published: Sep 15, 2011

Citations

2011 Ark. 363 (Ark. 2011)

Citing Cases

Sey v. State

We will accept a criminal appellant's belated brief to prevent an appeal from being aborted. Pennington v.…