From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Seguin v. Landfried

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Jun 8, 2012
96 A.D.3d 1433 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)

Opinion

2012-06-8

Lawrence D. SEGUIN and Kathleen M. Seguin, Plaintiffs–Respondents, v. Matthew J. LANDFRIED, M.D., Genesee Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine, LLP, Valerie S. Thomas, P.A., Peter T. Janes, M.D., Debra M. Omiatek, M.D., John A. Brach, M.D., Michael D. Merrill, M.D., Joseph V. Otten, M.D., United Memorial Medical Center, Defendants–Appellants, et al., Defendants.

Appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Tracey A. Bannister, J.), entered July 19, 2011 in a medical malpractice action. The order denied the motions of defendants-appellants for a change of venue. Roach, Brown, McCarthy & Gruber, P.C., Buffalo (J. Mark Gruber of Counsel), for defendants-appellants Matthew J. Landfried, M.D., Genesee Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine, LLP, Valerie S. Thomas, P.A., and Joseph V. Otten, M.D. Gibson, McAskill & Crosby, LLP, Buffalo (Angelo S. Gambino of Counsel), for defendants-appellants Peter T. Janes, M.D., Debra M. Omiatek, M.D., John A. Brach, M.D., and Michael D. Merrill, M.D.


Appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Tracey A. Bannister, J.), entered July 19, 2011 in a medical malpractice action. The order denied the motions of defendants-appellants for a change of venue.
Roach, Brown, McCarthy & Gruber, P.C., Buffalo (J. Mark Gruber of Counsel), for defendants-appellants Matthew J. Landfried, M.D., Genesee Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine, LLP, Valerie S. Thomas, P.A., and Joseph V. Otten, M.D. Gibson, McAskill & Crosby, LLP, Buffalo (Angelo S. Gambino of Counsel), for defendants-appellants Peter T. Janes, M.D., Debra M. Omiatek, M.D., John A. Brach, M.D., and Michael D. Merrill, M.D.
Feldman Kieffer, LLP, Buffalo (Randy C. Mallaber of Counsel), for defendant-appellant United Memorial Medical Center.

Brian P. Fitzgerald, P.C., Buffalo (Derek J. Roller of Counsel), for plaintiffs-respondents.

MEMORANDUM:

We agree with defendants-appellants (defendants) that Supreme Court improvidently exercised its discretion in denying their respective motions pursuant to CPLR 510(3) seeking to change the venue of this medical malpractice action from Erie County to Genesee County ( see Costello v. Forbes, 294 A.D.2d 856, 741 N.Y.S.2d 468). In support of their motions, defendants provided, inter alia, the physicians' affirmations and nurses' affidavits of 14 nonparty witnesses who treated Lawrence D. Seguin (plaintiff) at defendant United Memorial Medical Center in Genesee County and at Strong Memorial Hospital in Monroe County. The nonparty witnesses stated the nature of their treatment of plaintiff and their respective reasons for the inconvenience of traveling from their respective homes or places of *903work to Erie County ( see McLaughlin v. City of Buffalo, 259 A.D.2d 1014, 1015, 688 N.Y.S.2d 309;cf. Rochester Drug Coop., Inc. v. Marcott Pharmacy N. Corp., 15 A.D.3d 899, 789 N.Y.S.2d 779). Plaintiff Kathleen M. Seguin, who has asserted a derivative cause of action, moved to Erie County several months following plaintiff's treatment and it is upon the basis of her residence that the action was commenced in Erie County. Plaintiffs have “failed to demonstrate any other consideration that would favor [Erie] County as the proper venue of this action” ( McLaughlin, 259 A.D.2d at 1015, 688 N.Y.S.2d 309;see Costello, 294 A.D.2d at 856–857, 741 N.Y.S.2d 468). We therefore conclude that defendants established that “the convenience of material witnesses and the ends of justice will be promoted by the change” of venue (CPLR 510[3]; cf. 1093 Group, LLC v. Canale, 72 A.D.3d 1561, 1562, 900 N.Y.S.2d 561).

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously reversed in the exercise of discretion without costs and the motions are granted.

SCUDDER, P.J., SMITH, CARNI, LINDLEY, and MARTOCHE, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Seguin v. Landfried

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Jun 8, 2012
96 A.D.3d 1433 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
Case details for

Seguin v. Landfried

Case Details

Full title:Lawrence D. SEGUIN and Kathleen M. Seguin, Plaintiffs–Respondents, v…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.

Date published: Jun 8, 2012

Citations

96 A.D.3d 1433 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 4525
945 N.Y.S.2d 902

Citing Cases

Bray v. Town of Yorkshire

At best, such allegations are speculative and self-serving opinions regarding what others might do. Notably…

Bonnell v. Rodgers

We therefore conclude that the mother failed to demonstrate “good cause” for transferring this proceeding to…