From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Costello v. Forbes

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
May 3, 2002
294 A.D.2d 856 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)

Opinion

CA 01-01862

May 3, 2002.

Appeals from an order of Supreme Court, Erie County (Howe, J.), entered May 16, 2001, which denied defendants' motions seeking to change venue and granted plaintiff's cross motion seeking to dismiss the affirmative defenses of improper venue.

HARRIS BEACH LLP, PITTSFORD (SUE S. TEBOR OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS GARY FORBES, M.D., RAVI SINGH, M.D., TAI T. NGUYEN, M.D., THE GENESEE HOSPITAL, AND ROBERT BRANDON, M.D.

BROWN TARANTINO, LLP, ROCHESTER (JEFFREY S. ALBANESE OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS MICHAEL FALKOFF, M.D., J. STEVEN BURKHART, M.D., DAVID J. ROBERTS, M.D., CATALINA M. VIAL, M.D., GENESEE VALLEY OBSTETRICS GYNECOLOGY, P.C., JOHN D. KENNEDY, M.D., AND THE IDE GROUP, P.C.

REGAN REGAN, BUFFALO (LAWRENCE J. REGAN OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT.

PRESENT: GREEN, J.P., HURLBUTT, SCUDDER, AND LAWTON, JJ.


It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously reversed on the law without costs, the motions are granted and the cross motion is denied.

Memorandum:

Supreme Court improvidently exercised its discretion in denying defendants' motions pursuant to CPLR 510 (3) seeking to change the venue of this medical malpractice/wrongful death action from Erie County to Monroe County and in granting plaintiff's cross motion seeking to dismiss the affirmative defenses of improper venue. Although plaintiff, as administratrix of decedent's estate, resides in Erie County, defendants established that it is inconvenient for three nonparty material witnesses who reside in Monroe County to travel to Erie County to testify. Those witnesses are nurses formerly employed by defendant Genesee Hospital, which has since closed. In addition to providing their names and addresses, defendants provided affidavits of those witnesses stating that each is willing to testify, setting forth the facts to which those witnesses would be expected to testify, and explaining why it would be difficult to travel to Erie County to testify ( see O'Brien v. Vassar Bros. Hosp., 207 A.D.2d 169, 172-173). Plaintiff's two nonparty material witnesses are decedent's mother and decedent's husband, neither of whom resides in Erie County; decedent's mother resides on Long Island and decedent's husband resides in Wayne County. In addition, neither of those witnesses stated why it would be more convenient for the action to be tried in Erie County. Furthermore, the cause of action arose in Monroe County ( see id. at 174). We therefore conclude that the court erred in denying defendants' motions and granting plaintiff's cross motion.


Summaries of

Costello v. Forbes

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
May 3, 2002
294 A.D.2d 856 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
Case details for

Costello v. Forbes

Case Details

Full title:BARBARA COSTELLO, AS ADMINISTRATRIX OF THE ESTATE OF BONNIE LYNN DENNIE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: May 3, 2002

Citations

294 A.D.2d 856 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
741 N.Y.S.2d 468

Citing Cases

Seguin v. Landfried

MEMORANDUM: We agree with defendants-appellants (defendants) that Supreme Court improvidently exercised its…

Huttenlocker v. White

Defendants failed to meet their burden of establishing that the nonparty witnesses, law enforcement personnel…