From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Seccia v. State

Supreme Court of Florida
Jul 13, 2000
764 So. 2d 573 (Fla. 2000)

Opinion

No. SC94138

Opinion filed July 13, 2000

Application for Review of the Decision of the District Court of Appeal — Certified Direct Conflict of Decisions, First District — Case No. 1D97-3046, (Duval County).

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Mark E. Walker, Assistant Public Defender, Second Judicial Circuit, Tallahassee, Florida, for Petitioner.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, James W. Rogers, Tallahassee Bureau Chief, Criminal Appeals, and Sherri Tolar Rollison, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, Florida, for Respondent.


We have for review Seccia v. State, 720 So.2d 580 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998), on the basis of certified conflict with Mizell v. State, 716 So.2d 829 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998). We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const. We recently resolved this conflict in Maddox v. State, 25 Fla. L. Weekly S367 (Fla. May 11, 2000). Because the parties have not adequately briefed the merits of the alleged scoresheet error in this case, we remand for the district court's consideration in light of our opinion in Maddox.

We decline to address the other issues raised by Seccia that are not the basis of our jurisdiction. See, e.g., Wood v. State, 750 So.2d 592, 595 n. 3 (Fla. 1999); McMullen v. State, 714 So.2d 368, 373 (Fla. 1998).

It is so ordered.

WELLS, C.J., and SHAW, HARDING, ANSTEAD, PARIENTE, LEWIS and QUINCE, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Seccia v. State

Supreme Court of Florida
Jul 13, 2000
764 So. 2d 573 (Fla. 2000)
Case details for

Seccia v. State

Case Details

Full title:RICHARD SECCIA, Petitioner, vs. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: Jul 13, 2000

Citations

764 So. 2d 573 (Fla. 2000)

Citing Cases

Seccia v. State

The supreme court has remanded that scoresheet issue to us for further consideration in light of its decision…