Opinion
04-21-00482-CR
06-03-2024
Vincent Jeffrey SEARD, Appellant v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee
From the 216th Judicial District Court, Kerr County, Texas Trial Court No. A21432 Honorable Albert D. Pattillo, III, Judge Presiding
Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice, Irene Rios, Justice, Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice
ORDER
Irene Rios, Justice
Appellant Vincent Jeffrey Seard's motion for rehearing is DENIED. See Tex. R. App. P. 41.1, 49.3.
Vincent Jeffery Seard filed a pro se motion for rehearing as well. However, Seard does not have a right to hybrid representation. Scheanette v. State, 144 S.W.3d 503, 505 n.2 (Tex. Crim. App. 2004); see also Landers v. State, 550 S.W.2d 272, 280 (Tex. Crim. App. 1977) (defining hybrid representation as "representation partially pro se and partially by counsel"). Nor does he have a constitutional right to represent himself on direct appeal. Scheanette, 144 S.W.3d at 505 n.2. Thus, we do not address Seard's pro se motion for rehearing.