From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Scott v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO.
Dec 8, 2020
612 S.W.3d 274 (Mo. Ct. App. 2020)

Opinion

No. ED 108538

12-08-2020

Willie Bleyins SCOTT, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.

Stephen P. Ranz, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101, For Movant/Appellant. Robert J. Bartholomew, Jr., P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, For Respondent/Respondent.


Stephen P. Ranz, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101, For Movant/Appellant.

Robert J. Bartholomew, Jr., P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, For Respondent/Respondent.

Before Robin Ransom, P.J., Sherri B. Sullivan, J., and Lisa P. Page, J.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Willie Bleyins Scott appeals the motion court's judgment following an evidentiary hearing denying his amended Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Judgment and Sentence filed pursuant to Rule 29.15. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the judgment of the motion court was not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

All rule references are to Mo. R. Crim. P. (2018).
--------


Summaries of

Scott v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO.
Dec 8, 2020
612 S.W.3d 274 (Mo. Ct. App. 2020)
Case details for

Scott v. State

Case Details

Full title:Willie Bleyins SCOTT, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri…

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO.

Date published: Dec 8, 2020

Citations

612 S.W.3d 274 (Mo. Ct. App. 2020)