From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Scoggin v. Midfirst Bank

Court of Appeals of Texas, Second District, Fort Worth
May 27, 2004
No. 02-03-366-CV (Tex. App. May. 27, 2004)

Opinion

No. 02-03-366-CV

Delivered: May 27, 2004.

Appeal from County Court at Law No. 1 of Tarrant County.

Pro se, for appellant.

Smith, Broude Jennings; Janna Ward Clarke of Fort Worth, TX, for appellee.

Panel D: LIVINGSTON, DAUPHINOT, and HOLMAN, JJ.


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT


On April 1, 2004, we notified appellant that her brief had not been filed as required by rule 38.6(a). See Tex.R.App.P. 38.6(a). We stated we would dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless appellant or any party desiring to continue this appeal filed with the court within ten days a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal. We have not received any response.

Because appellant's brief has not been filed, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b).


Summaries of

Scoggin v. Midfirst Bank

Court of Appeals of Texas, Second District, Fort Worth
May 27, 2004
No. 02-03-366-CV (Tex. App. May. 27, 2004)
Case details for

Scoggin v. Midfirst Bank

Case Details

Full title:LANA WILSON SCOGGIN, Appellant v. MIDFIRST BANK, Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Second District, Fort Worth

Date published: May 27, 2004

Citations

No. 02-03-366-CV (Tex. App. May. 27, 2004)