From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Schliemann v. Fabian

United States District Court, D. Minnesota
Feb 13, 2007
Civ. No. 06-1103 (JNE/SRN) (D. Minn. Feb. 13, 2007)

Opinion

Civ. No. 06-1103 (JNE/SRN).

February 13, 2007


ORDER


In a Report and Recommendation dated January 24, 2007, the Honorable Susan Richard Nelson, United States Magistrate Judge, recommended that respondents' motion to dismiss be granted in part and denied without prejudice in part and that petitioner's motions to review tape and for an evidentiary hearing be denied. Petitioner objected to the Report and Recommendation. The Court has conducted a de novo review of the record. See D. Minn. LR 72.2(b). Based on that review, the Court adopts the Report and Recommendation. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THAT:

1. Respondents' motion to dismiss [Docket No. 5] is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE IN PART as set forth in the Report and Recommendation.
2. Petitioner's motion to review tape [Docket No. 2] is DENIED.
3. Petitioner's motion for an evidentiary hearing [Docket No. 11] is DENIED.
4. Respondents shall address petitioner's remaining habeas issue within thirty days of the date of this Order.


Summaries of

Schliemann v. Fabian

United States District Court, D. Minnesota
Feb 13, 2007
Civ. No. 06-1103 (JNE/SRN) (D. Minn. Feb. 13, 2007)
Case details for

Schliemann v. Fabian

Case Details

Full title:Rodney Allan Schliemann, Petitioner, v. Joan Fabian and State of…

Court:United States District Court, D. Minnesota

Date published: Feb 13, 2007

Citations

Civ. No. 06-1103 (JNE/SRN) (D. Minn. Feb. 13, 2007)

Citing Cases

Silverpony v. Goodno

"It is well-established that federal courts will not address procedurally defaulted claims on the merits…

Franklin v. Dingle

"It is well-established that federal courts will not address procedurally defaulted claims on the merits…