Opinion
June 8, 1995
Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Walter Schackman, J.).
The order and judgment on appeal merely confirms that aspect of the award that by a prior order had been severed from the proceeding and remanded to the arbitrator for clarification, namely, the arbitrator's calculation of petitioner's share of the building's water charges. Accordingly, the other controversies between the parties raised by petitioner are not reviewable in the context of this proceeding ( Grullon v. Servair, Inc., 121 A.D.2d 502, lv denied 69 N.Y.2d 608). Petitioner fails to show any basis for vacating or modifying the award insofar as it relates to water charges.
Concur — Murphy, P.J., Rubin, Kupferman and Ross, JJ.