From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Goldberg v. Goldberg

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 16, 1995
221 A.D.2d 233 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

November 16, 1995

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Lewis Friedman, J.).


The IAS Court appropriately determined that the parties' New York judgment of divorce is final and binding. While the claim for expert and counsel fees was previously severed, a severed cause of action does not impair the finality of the remaining judgment ( Scarab Equities Corp. v 684 Owners Corp., 216 A.D.2d 43; Grullon v Servair, Inc., 121 A.D.2d 502, lv denied 69 N.Y.2d 608). In any event, in the interim, plaintiff had waived her right to expert and counsel fees, and the court properly declared the issue closed. We have considered defendant's other arguments and find them to be without merit.

Concur — Rosenberger, J.P., Rubin, Kupferman, Asch and Mazzarelli, JJ.


Summaries of

Goldberg v. Goldberg

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 16, 1995
221 A.D.2d 233 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

Goldberg v. Goldberg

Case Details

Full title:SHEILA B. GOLDBERG, Respondent, v. BARTON L. GOLDBERG, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Nov 16, 1995

Citations

221 A.D.2d 233 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
633 N.Y.S.2d 491

Citing Cases

Goldberg v. Goldberg

Decided April 4, 1996 Appeal from (1st Dept: 221 A.D.2d 233) MOTIONS FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL GRANTED OR…