From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sautter v. Frick

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Oct 1, 1929
227 App. Div. 760 (N.Y. App. Div. 1929)

Opinion

October, 1929.

Appeal from Supreme Court, Wayne County.

Present — Sears, P.J., Taylor, Edgcomb, Thompson and Crosby, JJ. Appeal dismissed, without costs, and matter remitted to the Special Term to supply the defect. [ 133 Misc. 517.]


This action was tried before the court without a jury. There are no findings of facts or conclusions of law, and no decision which authorized the entry of the judgment appealed from. The opinion of the trial court cannot take the place of a formal decision. The appeal should, therefore, be dismissed, and the matter remitted to the Special Term to supply the defect. ( Minner v. Minner, 238 N.Y. 529; Ventimiglia v. Eichner, 213 id. 147; Herder v. Clifford, 225 App. Div. 780; Electric Boat Co. v. Howey, 96 id. 410.) All concur.


Summaries of

Sautter v. Frick

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Oct 1, 1929
227 App. Div. 760 (N.Y. App. Div. 1929)
Case details for

Sautter v. Frick

Case Details

Full title:EDWARD SAUTTER, Appellant, v. BELLE FRICK and Others, as Administrators…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Oct 1, 1929

Citations

227 App. Div. 760 (N.Y. App. Div. 1929)

Citing Cases

Fuller v. Galeota

( Hall v. Beston, 13 App. Div. 116; Dobbs v. Brinkerhoff, 98 App. Div. 258.) Under the peculiar facts in this…

Board of Educ. of Cent. School Dist. v. Woolsey

I dissent and vote to dismiss the appeal upon the ground that the judgment is not supported by findings of…