From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Herder v. Clifford

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 1, 1928
225 App. Div. 780 (N.Y. App. Div. 1928)

Opinion

December, 1928.

Appeal from Supreme Court, Oneida County.

Present — Clark, Sears, Crouch, Sawyer and Edgcomb, JJ. Appeal dismissed and matter remitted to the Special Term to proceed in accordance with per curiam memorandum, without costs.


The appeal should be dismissed on the ground that there was in fact a trial of an issue raised by an affirmative defense in the answer; that the judgment is without findings or a decision to support it and the matter should be remitted to the Special Term to supply the defects. ( Ventimiglia v. Eichner, 213 N.Y. 147.) Whether there was sufficient evidence to warrant any finding of fact may not be considered now, since the appeal is not properly here. All concur.


Summaries of

Herder v. Clifford

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 1, 1928
225 App. Div. 780 (N.Y. App. Div. 1928)
Case details for

Herder v. Clifford

Case Details

Full title:GEORGE B. HERDER and Others, as Taxpayers in the Town of Vienna, in the…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Dec 1, 1928

Citations

225 App. Div. 780 (N.Y. App. Div. 1928)

Citing Cases

Sautter v. Frick

The appeal should, therefore, be dismissed, and the matter remitted to the Special Term to supply the defect.…

Fuller v. Galeota

( Hall v. Beston, 13 App. Div. 116; Dobbs v. Brinkerhoff, 98 App. Div. 258.) Under the peculiar facts in this…