From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Satterthwaite v. First Bank

Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth
Jul 30, 2020
No. 02-20-00182-CV (Tex. App. Jul. 30, 2020)

Opinion

No. 02-20-00182-CV

07-30-2020

THOMAS SATTERTHWAITE JR. AND JESSICA SHAW, Appellants v. FIRST BANK D/B/A FIRST BANK MORTGAGE AND ITS SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS, Appellee


On Appeal from County Court at Law No. 2 Denton County, Texas
Trial Court No. CV-2020-00263-JP Before Gabriel, Kerr, and Birdwell, JJ.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellants Thomas Satterthwaite Jr. and Jessica Shaw attempt to appeal from the county court's judgment of possession, which was signed on March 16, 2020. Because Appellants did not timely file their notice of appeal, we dismiss their appeal for want of jurisdiction.

Appellee First Bank filed a forcible-detainer action against Appellants, asserting a superior right to possession to a home in Frisco. See Tex. Prop. Code Ann. § 24.002. On March 16, 2020, the trial court signed a judgment of possession, finding Appellants "guilty of Forcible Detainer" and ordering that First Bank have possession of the property. The trial court also ordered Appellants evicted from the property and set an "appeal bond" in the amount of "$2,750.00 per month due on the 1st day of the month." See id. §§ 24.0061, 24.007; Tex. R. Civ. P. 510.13. Appellants filed a notice of appeal from the judgment of possession on June 16, 2020—92 days after the judgment had been signed.

On July 2, we notified Appellants that because no post-judgment motion had been filed, the notice of appeal had been due no later than April 15; thus, we questioned our jurisdiction over Appellants' attempted appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.1, 42.3(a). We warned Appellants that we could dismiss their appeal if they did not respond showing grounds for our jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 44.3. Appellants responded and asserted that on June 5—81 days after the judgment of possession had been signed—they had filed an "emergency motion on the writ of possession" and that the trial court had ruled that they "had until June 15, 2020 at 5:00 p.m. to provide documentation showing the perfection of an appeal." Appellants contend that they believed this acted as an extension of the appellate deadline.

An extension of time to file a notice of appeal may only be granted by this court, not the county court, and must be sought within 45 days of the date of the judgment if no timely post-judgment motion is filed. See Tex. R. App. P. 3.1(b), 26.1(a), 26.3; In re J.A., 53 S.W.3d 869, 872 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2001, no pet.). See generally Verburgt v. Dorner, 959 S.W.2d 615, 617 (Tex. 1997) ("[O]nce the period for granting a motion for extension of time under Rule [26.3] has passed, a party can no longer invoke the appellate court's jurisdiction."). Even if Appellants' emergency motion regarding the writ of possession were considered to be a post-judgment motion, it was filed more than 30 days after the trial court signed the judgment of possession; thus, the emergency motion did not operate to extend the notice-of-appeal deadline. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.1(a); Tex. R. Civ. P. 329b(a). Accordingly, Appellants did not file an effective post-judgment motion, extending the appellate deadline, nor did they file their notice of appeal or an equivalent filing within 30 days of the trial court's judgment of possession. Absent these actions, we do not have jurisdiction over Appellants' appeal and we dismiss it. See Tex. R. App. P. 43.2(f); Webb-Goodwin v. Trails of White Rock, No. 05-18-00145-CV, 2018 WL 1281305, at *1 (Tex. App.—Dallas Mar. 13, 2018, no pet.) (mem. op.).

We recognize that the Texas Supreme Court has issued an emergency order regarding the COVID-19 state of disaster that extends filing and service deadlines falling between March 13, 2020, and June 1, 2020. However, this order specifies that the extension "does not include deadlines for perfecting appeal." Tex. Sup. Ct., Misc. Docket No. 20-9059 (Apr. 27, 2020); see also Tex. Sup. Ct., Misc. Docket No. 20-9071 (May 26, 2020) (renewing April 27, 2020 emergency order regarding extensions).

/s/ Lee Gabriel

Lee Gabriel

Justice Delivered: July 30, 2020


Summaries of

Satterthwaite v. First Bank

Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth
Jul 30, 2020
No. 02-20-00182-CV (Tex. App. Jul. 30, 2020)
Case details for

Satterthwaite v. First Bank

Case Details

Full title:THOMAS SATTERTHWAITE JR. AND JESSICA SHAW, Appellants v. FIRST BANK D/B/A…

Court:Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth

Date published: Jul 30, 2020

Citations

No. 02-20-00182-CV (Tex. App. Jul. 30, 2020)

Citing Cases

Ramos v. Veracruz Foods, LLC

We construed the language of the order that we reviewed in Prescod under the assumption that it gave a trial…

Prescod v. Tkach

Regardless, assuming without deciding that the trial court had the power to modify or suspend limitations as…