From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Saterstad v. Stover

United States District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Nov 14, 2006
Civil Action No. 1:06-CV-2070 (M.D. Pa. Nov. 14, 2006)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 1:06-CV-2070.

November 14, 2006.


ORDER


AND NOW, this 14th day of November, 2006, upon consideration of pro se plaintiff's correspondence requesting five civil case subpoenas (Doc. 8), see FED. R. CIV. P. 45(a)(3) ("The clerk shall issue a subpoena, signed but otherwise in blank, to a party requesting it. . . ."), it is hereby ORDERED that:

Before defendants removed the above-captioned action to this court, in June 2006 the Dauphin County Court of Common Pleas granted plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis. (See Doc. 4-8.) However, this court has not had the opportunity to evaluate plaintiff's current economic status. Therefore, the court will allow plaintiff to file a renewed application to proceed in forma pauperis.

The court notes that plaintiff does not indicate the purpose for the requested subpoenas, which would not be required to seek discovery from defendants. See, e.g., FED. R. CIV. P. 33, 34, 36.

1. The request for subpoenas (Doc. 8) is GRANTED as follows:
a. The Clerk of Court is directed to issue to plaintiff five (5) subpoenas, signed but otherwise in blank. See FED. R. CIV. P. 45(a)(3).
b. Plaintiff shall be permitted to file with the court, on or before December 13, 2006, one or more subpoenas, completed in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 45.
c. The court shall direct service of any timely and properly completed subpoenas as it deems appropriate.
d. Plaintiff shall not mail the completed subpoenas to or otherwise attempt to serve the completed subpoenas on the person(s) named therein. See FED. R. CIV. P. 45(b)(1); see also id. 45 cmt. § C45-9. Failure to comply with this provision will result in the imposition of sanctions, potentially including dismissal of the above-captioned case. See FED. R. CIV. P. 16(f), 41(b).
2. The Clerk of Court is directed to send to plaintiff, via United States mail, an application to proceed in forma pauperis.

3. Plaintiff shall file, on or before December 13, 2006, a renewed application to proceed in forma pauperis. Failure to comply with this paragraph will result in the assessment of any service fees on plaintiff.


Summaries of

Saterstad v. Stover

United States District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Nov 14, 2006
Civil Action No. 1:06-CV-2070 (M.D. Pa. Nov. 14, 2006)
Case details for

Saterstad v. Stover

Case Details

Full title:EDWARD SATERSTAD, Plaintiff, v. KEVIN STOVER, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Nov 14, 2006

Citations

Civil Action No. 1:06-CV-2070 (M.D. Pa. Nov. 14, 2006)